by futurist consultant Ersan Seer


Genetic Manipulation of Humans, Animals, Plants: A Fresh Outlook

Green Soybeans, by Kanko

Photo credit: Green Soybeans, by Kanko* @ Flickr. Click photo to see more of this photographer's work.

Genetic manipulation. What an intimidating phrase.

Genetics isn’t just any science — it’s a science about us. About parts of ourselves that we have never been able to change — until now. Like: beauty, strength, health. Scientists are currently developing technologies which will allow us to play Mr. Potato Head with humans.

Manipulation. Something about the word hints at retribution and doom.

Genetic engineering, genetic modification, genetic engimodifneerificationing…

I had many other openminded, non-sensationalist phrases to choose from. So why’d I choose genetic manipulation as the topic of this post?

Because what we’re doing with genetics today isn’t as tame as modification, isn’t as create-from-the-ground-up as engineering.

It’s hacking with cells. Exploiting. Distorting.


And yet… despite all that…
(prepare to be brutally honest with yourself)…

Humans have evolved into the most intelligent and powerful life form on earth precisely because we are better at tampering with Mother Nature.

The paradigm “I am human, therefore I manipulate my environment” has it backwards, and the reverse is actually true: I manipulate my environment, therefore I am human.

My goal here is to unravel the tangle of emotions most of us feel around genetic manipulation. The way to achieve that is through truth.

The first truth: genetic manipulation isn’t new.

I know, all the hubbub in the news makes this issue seem brand-new. But it’s not.

You see, humans have been genetically manipulating their surroundings for thousands of years — through a process called “artificial selection.”

The second truth: where preservation of the earth is concerned, whether you buy organic or GMO doesn’t matter.

Our most basic foods are the way they are because of our tampering. They exist because of our tampering.

  • The next time someone expounds on the perils of GMO corn and advocates a return to organic, natural corn… just remember even “natural corn” isn’t natural. Corn didn’t exist in its current form until we tampered with it.
  • You like dogs? Cats? They wouldn’t exist without the tampering of our ancestors. Did you know that we bred the bark into the dog?
  • Peppers aren’t supposed to be eaten. Capsaicin, the compound responsible for spiciness, is an irritant to mammals! It was meant to protect peppers so that they could propagate and survive. Well, humans have grown a taste for that spiciness, and as a result peppers have thrived – but for a totally different reason. We’ve created thousands of totally different pepper varieties. Some aren’t even spicy anymore. Peppers are peppers because of our tampering.
  • Beef.
  • Tea.
  • Soybeans.
  • Potatoes.
  • Wheat.
  • Apples.

And it’s not limited to food. There’s penicillin, houseplants, yucca, tulips, rubber, cotton…

The third truth: to live is to genetically manipulate other life.

All predators genetically manipulate other animals. All herbivores genetically manipulate the plants they feed on. All plants genetically manipulate their competition.

You are part of this game, and you have no choice in the matter (unless, of course, you choose not to live).

Hawks, over millennia, kill and eat the rodents which are the least fit and the most reckless. Hawks have, effectively, created new rodents.

It’s no different than what we do, except on a much smaller scale.

The fourth truth: evolution is the byproduct of genetic manipulation, of the interplay between environments and life. From that perspective, the outcry against GMO foods is ridiculous.

A search at Google for genetically modified foods turns up phrases like “Harmful or Helpful?” and “Panacea or Poison.” It’s no secret that, as a whole, humans are conflicted about the morality of genetic manipulation.


The heart of the matter, I believe, is fear.

You don’t have to be a scientist to know we’re creating incredibly powerful technologies, which have the capability to permanently damage the mother we all share, our only-and-only Earth.

These fears are justified. What happens if one big genetic catastrophe eradicates 99% of our plant life? Earth will become a barely habitable wreck. Then we die off.

Despite all this, some people aren’t worried by genetic manipulation. They have better things to occupy their time with: power and money. They rely on the development of genetic technology to create more power and more money. And since they have power, and (statistically speaking) you don’t, genetic technology will continue to advance and work its way into the fabric of modern civilization regardless of your momentary panic while reading this article.

It’s not good, it’s not bad, it just is.

There’s another group of people, of which I’m a part. We believe that the earth is beautiful and should be protected at all costs. But we also believe that progress, of which technology is a major facet, is beautiful.

Sometimes the progression of a specific technology endangers the earth. Like genetic manipulation. What then?

I recognize that I am not the sole owner of this earth, and that no group of humans, however large, can halt the pursuit of knowledge (and development of technology). So here’s my stance:

Continue developing the technology. Just be careful.

Ersan Seer

Ersan Seer is a futurist consultant, coolhunter, market researcher, strategic advisor, and concept artist. Ersan hungers to make the future world a more peaceful, survivable place.  → Read More & Book Ersan Seer

3 Responses to Genetic Manipulation of Humans, Animals, Plants: A Fresh Outlook

  1. Lucifer Findley says:

    I agree. Technology has led us to even more and more beautiful ways to look at the world, but I think it is important to remember our past as well, both in terms of nature and human nature. I think love is one of the most influential traits we posses, and I would be damned if one day out of the desire to consume more information we completely rid future life of this emotion because it is a “nuiance” to that goal. I dread the day people want to look at the world without that emotion and instead as “just a simulation.”

  2. Kay McCarthy says:

    You are defending eating Round Up Ready?
    Because we CAN manipulate our environment doesn’t mean we should do so without regard for conseuqneces of our immediate health and well-being as well as our impersonal, distant future.

    • Ersan Seer says:

      Kay, I am not defending Monsanto. They’re criminally reckless. They’re playing roulette with the welfare of all of humanity, and they’re doing it without our permission.

      I defend technological progress, a beautiful thing, arguably the very trait which makes humans human. Technological progress has gotten a bad reputation lately because of companies like Monsanto.

      The problem here is that technological progress tends to be driven by capitalism. Also, the most grubby-fingered, cutthroat capitalists tend to survive better than the morally sound ones. So technology, a beautiful thing, cannot currently exist without the necessary evil of cutthroat capitalism. This will change when (if) humans evolve emotionally… when capitalism will just be capitalism, and not cutthroat.

      I also suggest that everyone take a long, hard look at the concept of “organic”. I believe it’s a humongous delusion, a marketing scheme. There is no such thing as organic corn, because we created corn in its current state. We were empowered to create it that way by technological progress.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

8 − = three

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>